Aiyima remote control codes

First published on

I "upgraded" my old Technics SU-VX700 amplifier a couple weeks ago. After 15 years of loyal service I wanted to switch to something that had digital inputs, was more energy efficient, and had a remote control. After some digging I found the Aiyima D03. It checked all the boxes + was tiny, had bluetooth and was and only 150 euros. I call it "upgraded" because the Technics was a beast of a Class AA (whatever that means) amplifier and probably very Hifi worthy, the D03 might be considered a downgrade by audiophiles, but I'm not sophisticated enough to be able to tell the difference. Mind you, I am sophisticated enough to be very annoyed by TVs without external speakers. I think both amps sound great on my Linn Keilidh speakers.

The remote control was nice, but it's a separate one from my tv. Using the optical toslink output the volume buttons on my TV do nothing. Annoying for me and my family and very confusing for guests who wonder why the TV has no sound.

I started using some esphome microcontrollers for various home automation tasks, and I got an idea. Why don't I listen on IR to my TV remote and if the volume buttons are pressed, mimic the Aiyima remote and send the volume signals there too. I actually ordered some IR Transmitter and IR Receiver break-out boards some time ago but never used them before.

On a Saturday night I hooked everything up and started debugging the signals from the Philips and Aiyima remote controls. I took a quick look with my oscilloscope but then found how to come to a conclusion quicker using this blog.

The Philips one was easy enough and showed up right away. The Aiyima uses some custom prefix and codes, or at least one not known to the esphome libraries. Many manufacturers use overlapping protocols (even though the keys might not overlap, not all the address space is used) so it recognized JVC, Pronto, Pioneer and some other codes.

Through trial and error I got it to work by using transmit_pioneer 0x4d80 through 0x4dff.

So if you ever want to accomplish the same, here are all the buttons on the remote mapped out.


Action - #nr - pioneer equivalent hex code

bas- 0 0x4d80

tre- 1 0x4d81 

mode 2 0x4d82

bas+ 8 0x4d88

previous 25 0x4d99

next 65 0x4dc1

tre+ 69 0x4dc5

vol+ 74 0x4dca

mute 78 0x4dce

vol- 82 0x4dd2

off 92 0x4ddc

Having examined how similar the different protocols are, I feel like there might be a better way of doing this than emulating pioneer but I'm happy with this solution for now.

I was hoping that there would be secret codes on the amp that were not present on the remote control, to idempotently switch off the amp, switch to a specific input or go to a pre-set volume. That would be great for some more automation. I tried all 256 codes from 0x4d00 to 0x4dff but did not get any results. It's possible that an idempotent "switch on" is present but I didn't want to try all codes twice. I thought of Shenzen IO and realized that of course no one had time for this. That's what I deserve for always saying YAGNI to my engineers.

If you want to plug this into esphome, you can do it like so. This contains just one action but the rest can be extrapolated from the table above:

button:
- platform: template 
    name: amp mute toggle
    on_press:
      - remote_transmitter.transmit_pioneer:
          rc_code_1: 0x4dce # amp mute tuggle

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Security Is Our Top Priority" is BS

First published on
A couple of years ago I was asked to give a conference talk about software security. Well, actually I wasn't really asked, my company bought a sponsorship package with a speaker slot and I replied to the internal email asking for volunteers  🤣  Anyway, while preparing my talk, I realized a couple of important points about security that have not left my mind since: Security is limitless . You can always spend more effort to make things more secure. The same goes for quality, safety, employee happiness, etc. The needs of security are opposed to the needs of a convenient user experience . Improving one typically hurts the other. Now some organizations say "Security is our #1 priority". Really? You want to make something that has no limits your number one priority? I mean security is a good thing, but this seems a bit too simple? In fact, hollow marketing claims like that can make me a bit angry. In this post I'll help you understand what to make of statements like that...
Read more

AI programming tools should be added to the Joel Test

First published on
Here's a wake-up call to all CTOs: AI programming tools are getting freaking amazing and if you don't allow your teams to use them somehow, it will bite you in the ass in a couple of years. You will be slower and you will lose your best people. The infamous Joel Test is a list from the year 2000 of 12 things all great software companies do. Since then most companies have implemented Git and CI/CD, checking of three items, so we have some space left in the 2024 update ;) I believe "Do you allow your developers to use AI assisted development environments?" is a necessary addition. I get that you don't want your source code to end up on some OpenAI / Microsoft / Github server somewhere, sure, but find a way to use your own models or learn to live with it. Note that this is often not the same as "#9 - Do you use the best tools money can buy?" as blocking AI tools is about data security, not money. So why do I think developers need AI programming tools? I...
Read more

The long long tail of AI applications

First published on
Image
Last year multiple companies asked me for advice. " We are evaluating this AI powered product, but do you think it makes sense at all? It seems a bit niche and we think ChatGPT might make this entire thing obsolete soon. " Long tail - credit to Wikipedia My answer so far has always been: "No, bare LLMs are not going to compete with this product." I think that people are failing to understand the distinction between different classes of AI companies. I see it like this: Foundational AI - creating models like GPT-4 (text), Sora (video) etc. Applied AI - using existing models to create smart applications. Note that there are also companies not focusing on AI - they will start lagging behind, let's forget about them ;) There are orders of magnitude  (!)   more companies that will deal with Applied AI than Foundational AI, and they will be very busy for decades to come. Here's why: To get the most out of LLMs, you have to ask the right questions. LLMs have acc...
Read more